Opel Omega 1999 vs Subaru Outback 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 209 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 282 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Opel Omega engine produces 65 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 79 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Omega consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Omega consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Opel Omega is larger, but lower. Opel Omega is 18 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 464 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity. Opel Omega has 76 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`205 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |