Opel Omega 1989 vs BMW 5 series 1988

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1994
BMW 5 series
1988 - 1995
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Opel Omega is available only with rear wheel drive, while BMW 5 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.61.8 - 4.0

Performance

Power: 73 - 377 HP113 - 286 HP
Torque: 138 - 568 NM162 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 - 19 seconds6.3 - 14 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.9 - 11.07.0 - 12.0
Opel Omega petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series. On average, Opel Omega equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.72 m
Width: 1.76 m1.75 m
Height: 1.44 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega is 2 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
870 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 60 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`942~ 1`999
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 30003600
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv