Opel Omega 1989 vs Mercedes E class 1993

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Omega
1989 - 1994
Mercedes E class
1993 - 1995
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Opel Omega is available only with rear wheel drive, while Mercedes E class can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.62.0 - 6.0

Performance

Power: 73 - 377 HP75 - 381 HP
Torque: 138 - 568 NM126 - 470 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 - 19 seconds5.4 - 20.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.9 - 11.06.7 - 13.0
Opel Omega petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes E class. On average, Opel Omega equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.74 m
Width: 1.76 m1.75 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega and Mercedes E class are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres520 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
870 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters12.1 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`942~ 2`040
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

high
Average price (€): 30002600
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Mercedes E klase has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv