Opel Omega 1999 vs BMW 5 series 1995

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Omega
1999 - 2003
BMW 5 series
1995 - 2000
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 5.72.0 - 4.4

Performance

Power: 100 - 310 HP115 - 286 HP
Torque: 203 - 450 NM190 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7 - 15 seconds6.2 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.6 - 14.05.9 - 12.2
Opel Omega petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series. On average, Opel Omega equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.78 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.46 m1.44 m
Opel Omega is 12 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 70 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`139~ 2`077
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 12002200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv