Opel Omega 1989 vs Volvo 960 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 - 200 HP | 115 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 - 265 NM | 225 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 20.5 seconds | 9 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 11.3 | 8.2 - 11.2 | |
|
Opel Omega petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo 960. On average, Opel Omega equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
| Opel Omega is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 2 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | 2125 litres | |
|
Volvo 960 has more luggage space. Opel Omega has 452 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 960. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 960 (by 270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`029 | ~ 2`063 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |