Opel Omega 1989 vs Mazda 626 1988
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Opel Omega is available with rear wheel drive, while Mazda 626 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.8 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 - 200 HP | 61 - 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 - 265 NM | 121 - 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 20.5 seconds | 10.5 - 20.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 11.3 | 6.9 - 9.2 | |
|
Opel Omega petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, Opel Omega equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Opel Omega is larger. Opel Omega is 18 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 8 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`029 | ~ 1`066 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 626 has
| |