Opel Omega 1989 vs Mercedes E class 1989

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

	Opel Omega 1989 - 1994	Mercedes E class 1989 - 1993
Gearbox:	Manual/Automatic	Manual/Automatic
Wheel drive type:	Rear wheel drive (RWD)	Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
	Opel Omega is available only with rear wheel drive, while Mercedes E class can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines:	2.0 - 3.0	2.0 - 3.2
Performance
Power:	73 - 200 HP	75 - 220 HP
Torque:	138 - 265 NM	126 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	8.2 - 20.5 seconds	8 - 21.7 seconds
	Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	7.2 - 11.3	7.2 - 11.9
	Opel Omega petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes E class. On average, Opel Omega equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions
Length:	4.77 m	4.76 m
Width:	1.77 m	1.74 m
Height:	1.48 m	1.49 m
	Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega is 1 cm longer than the Mercedes E class, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	540 litres	no data
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	1855 litres	no data
Turning diameter:	10.9 meters	11.2 meters
	The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class.
Gross weight (kg):	~ 2`029	~ 1`826

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	below average	high
Average price (€):	3000	2400
Pros and Cons:	Opel Omega has lower fuel consumption	Mercedes E klase has available with 4x4 drive fewer faults lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Opel Omega 1989 vs Mercedes E class 1989

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions