Opel Omega 1994 vs Volvo 850 1993
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Opel Omega is available with rear wheel drive, while Volvo 850 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.3 - 2.4 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 211 HP | 140 - 226 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 270 NM | 206 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 15 seconds | 7.5 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 10.0 | 9.1 - 9.7 | |
|
On average, the Opel Omega petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Volvo 850. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Opel Omega is larger. Opel Omega is 11 cm longer than the Volvo 850, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volvo 850, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`195 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Volvo 850 has
| |