Opel Omega 1994 vs Volvo V90 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.9 - 3.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 211 HP | 180 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 270 NM | 260 - 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 15 seconds | 9.2 - 9.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 10.0 | 11.0 - 11.7 | |
|
Opel Omega petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
| Opel Omega is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | 1702 litres | |
| Opel Omega has 452 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 98 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V90, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`195 | ~ 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |