Opel Omega 1994 vs Citroen Xantia 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Opel Omega is available with rear wheel drive, while Citroen Xantia can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.8 - 2.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 211 HP | 75 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 270 NM | 135 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 15 seconds | 10 - 18 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 10.0 | 7.0 - 10.3 | |
|
Opel Omega petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xantia. On average, Opel Omega equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xantia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Opel Omega is larger. Opel Omega is 16 cm longer than the Citroen Xantia, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen Xantia, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`195 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen Xantia has
| |