Opel Omega 1997 vs BMW 5 series 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 - 211 HP | 115 - 286 HP | |
Torque: | 175 - 270 NM | 190 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 16.5 seconds | 6.2 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 12.1 | 5.9 - 12.2 | |
Opel Omega petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series. On average, Opel Omega equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
Opel Omega is 4 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity. Opel Omega has 80 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`201 | ~ 2`077 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |