Opel Omega 1997 vs BMW 5 series 1995

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Omega
1997 - 1999
BMW 5 series
1995 - 2000
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 3.02.0 - 4.4

Performance

Power: 100 - 211 HP115 - 286 HP
Torque: 175 - 270 NM190 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 - 16.5 seconds6.2 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.2 - 12.15.9 - 12.2
Opel Omega petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series. On average, Opel Omega equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.78 m
Width: 1.79 m1.80 m
Height: 1.50 m1.44 m
Opel Omega is 4 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1800 litresno data
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 80 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`201~ 2`077
Safety:
Quality:
low

average
Average price (€): 10002200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv