Opel Omega 1997 vs BMW 5 series 1995

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Omega
1997 - 1999
BMW 5 series
1995 - 2000
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 3.02.0 - 4.4

Performance

Power: 100 - 211 HP136 - 286 HP
Torque: 175 - 270 NM190 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 - 16.5 seconds6.3 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.2 - 12.16.1 - 13.0
On average, the Opel Omega petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as BMW 5 series. On average, Opel Omega equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.80 m
Width: 1.79 m1.80 m
Height: 1.50 m1.44 m
Opel Omega is 2 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres410 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1800 litres1525 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 130 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 275 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`201~ 2`253
Safety:
Quality:
low

average
Average price (€): 10005200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv