Opel Omega 1999 vs Volvo V70 2007

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Omega
1999 - 2003
Volvo V70
2007 - 2011
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Opel Omega is available only with rear wheel drive, while Volvo V70 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 5.71.6 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 100 - 310 HP114 - 304 HP
Torque: 203 - 450 NM190 - 441 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7 - 16 seconds6.9 - 13.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.7 - 14.04.3 - 11.3
Opel Omega petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V70. On average, Opel Omega equipped with diesel engines consume 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.82 m
Width: 1.78 m1.86 m
Height: 1.50 m1.54 m
Opel Omega is 8 cm longer than the Volvo V70, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Omega is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres575 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1800 litresno data
Volvo V70 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Opel Omega has 35 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. This could mean that the Opel Omega uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo V70, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`274~ 2`292
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 12004600
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo V70 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv