Opel Omega 1999 vs Toyota Corolla 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Opel Omega is available with rear wheel drive, while Toyota Corolla can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.7 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 310 HP | 90 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 - 450 NM | 130 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 - 16 seconds | 10.2 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 14.0 | 5.9 - 7.9 | |
|
Opel Omega petrol engines consumes on average 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Opel Omega equipped with diesel engines consume 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Opel Omega is larger. Opel Omega is 52 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`274 | ~ 1`225 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |