Opel Omega 1999 vs SAAB 9-5 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Omega
1999 - 2003
SAAB 9-5
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Opel Omega is available with rear wheel drive, while SAAB 9-5 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 5.72.0 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 100 - 310 HP120 - 250 HP
Torque: 203 - 450 NM240 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7 - 16 seconds7.3 - 13.5 seconds
In general, SAAB 9-5 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Opel Omega. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.7 - 14.06.9 - 11.3
Opel Omega petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-5. On average, Opel Omega equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.83 m
Width: 1.78 m1.79 m
Height: 1.50 m1.50 m
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Omega is 7 cm longer than the SAAB 9-5, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 540 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1800 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.2 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-5.
Gross weight: ~ 2`274 kg~ 1`800 kg
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons:
    SAAB 9-5 has
    • more powerful and dynamic engines
    • lower fuel consumption
    • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv