Opel Omega 1999 vs Opel Omega 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Omega
1999 - 2003
Opel Omega
1999 - 2003
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 5.72.0 - 5.7

Performance

Power: 100 - 310 HP100 - 310 HP
Torque: 203 - 450 NM203 - 450 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7 - 16 seconds7 - 15 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.7 - 14.06.6 - 14.0
Opel Omega 1999 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Omega 1999. On average, Opel Omega 1999 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega 1999.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.90 m
Width: 1.78 m1.78 m
Height: 1.50 m1.46 m
Opel Omega 1999 and Opel Omega 1999 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres530 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1800 litres830 litres
Opel Omega 1999 has 10 litres more trunk space than the Opel Omega 1999. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega 1999 (by 970 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`274~ 2`139
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons:
    Opel Omega has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv