Opel Omega 1999 vs Peugeot 307 2002

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Omega
1999 - 2003
Peugeot 307
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Opel Omega is available with rear wheel drive, while Peugeot 307 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 5.71.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 100 - 310 HP68 - 138 HP
Torque: 203 - 450 NM120 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7 - 16 seconds9.5 - 16.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.7 - 14.04.7 - 8.8
Opel Omega petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 307. On average, Opel Omega equipped with diesel engines consume 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.42 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.50 m1.51 m
Opel Omega is larger, but slightly lower.
Opel Omega is 48 cm longer than the Peugeot 307, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres503 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1800 litres1540 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity.
Opel Omega has 37 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 307. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 260 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`274~ 1`991
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

low
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Peugeot 307 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv