Opel Mokka 2012 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Opel Mokka engine produces 10 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Despite less power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that by driving the Opel Mokka over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Yeti can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Mokka is 6 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Mokka is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 322 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1372 litres | 1665 litres | |
| Opel Mokka has 34 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Yeti (by 293 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Opel Mokka can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`959 kg | 2`130 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`490 kg | 1`560 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 469 kg | 570 kg | |
| Opel Mokka load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Skoda Yeti. Therefore, Skoda Yeti is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |