Opel Mokka 2012 vs Mazda CX-3 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Opel Mokka) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda CX-3) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Opel Mokka engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, but torque is 90 NM more than Mazda CX-3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Opel Mokka is larger. Opel Mokka and Mazda CX-3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1260 litres | |
| Opel Mokka has 6 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 112 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`959 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests, but Mazda CX-3 is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Mokka has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |