Opel Mokka 2012 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Opel Mokka is more dynamic to drive. Opel Mokka engine produces 27 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Opel Mokka over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 1100 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Qashqai version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Nissan Qashqai 2010 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Opel Mokka is smaller, but higher. Opel Mokka is 5 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Mokka is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1513 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Opel Mokka has 54 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 141 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`959 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |