Opel Mokka 2012 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010

 
Opel Mokka
2012 - 2016
Mitsubishi ASX
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.7 Diesel1.8 Diesel

Performance

Power: 130 HP150 HP
Torque: 300 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds10 seconds
Opel Mokka engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.75.7
Real fuel consumption: 5.6 l/100km6.8 l/100km
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Mokka consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Opel Mokka over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1140 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
1310 km on highway1280 km on highway
960 km with real consumption920 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.30 m
Width: 1.78 m1.77 m
Height: 1.66 m1.62 m
Opel Mokka is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Mokka is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 356 litres419 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1372 litres1219 litres
Opel Mokka has 63 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 153 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX.
Gross weight (kg): 1`959no data
Safety:
Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests, but Mitsubishi ASX is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
high

high
Mitsubishi ASX has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Mokka, so Mitsubishi ASX quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 96006600
Pros and Cons: Opel Mokka has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Mitsubishi ASX has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv