Opel Mokka 2012 vs Mazda CX-3 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Opel Mokka is more dynamic to drive. Opel Mokka engine produces 25 HP more power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mazda CX-3. Thanks to more power Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.0 | |
|
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Mokka consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Opel Mokka is larger. Opel Mokka and Mazda CX-3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1372 litres | 1260 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-3. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`959 kg | 1`735 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`490 kg | 1`200 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 469 kg | 535 kg | |
| Opel Mokka load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Mazda CX-3. Therefore, Mazda CX-3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests, but Mazda CX-3 is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Mokka has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |