Opel Mokka 2012 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013

 
Opel Mokka
2012 - 2016
Chevrolet Trax
2013 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.7 Diesel1.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 130 HP130 HP
Torque: 300 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds9.6 seconds
Opel Mokka and Chevrolet Trax have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.74.5
Real fuel consumption: 5.6 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Opel Mokka is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Opel Mokka consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 30 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Mokka consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1140 km in combined cycle1150 km in combined cycle
1310 km on highway1300 km on highway
960 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.25 m
Width: 1.78 m1.78 m
Height: 1.66 m1.67 m
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Mokka is 3 cm longer than the Chevrolet Trax, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Mokka is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 356 litres356 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1372 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.8 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`9591`888
Safety:
Opel Mokka is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 96008400
Pros and Cons: Opel Mokka has
  • higher children safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Chevrolet Trax has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv