Opel Mokka 2012 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Opel Mokka and Chevrolet Trax have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
The Opel Mokka is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Mokka consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
1310 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
960 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.25 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Mokka is 3 cm longer than the Chevrolet Trax, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Mokka is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 356 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`959 | 1`888 | |
Safety: | |||
Opel Mokka is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 8400 | 8200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
| |