Opel Mokka 2012 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 227 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Opel Mokka engine produces 54 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 72 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Due to the lower power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 9.7 | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Mokka consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Opel Mokka over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki Grand Vitara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Astra | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Mokka might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Mokka is 2 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Mokka is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 758 litres | |
| Opel Mokka has 42 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 614 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.2 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`959 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 145 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |