Opel Mokka 2012 vs Renault Captur 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Captur is a more dynamic driving. Opel Mokka engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Renault Captur. Due to the lower power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Captur can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Captur version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Astra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.57 m | |
| Opel Mokka is 16 cm longer than the Renault Captur, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Mokka is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1235 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Opel Mokka has 21 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. This could mean that the Opel Mokka uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 137 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Captur, which means Opel Mokka can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`959 | 1`726 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests, but Renault Captur is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Captur has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Renault Captur has
| |