Opel Mokka 2012 vs Honda HR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Honda HR-V is a more dynamic driving. Opel Mokka engine produces 15 HP less power than Honda HR-V, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.6 | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Mokka consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Honda HR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda HR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Honda HR-V version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Astra | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Mokka might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.61 m | |
| Opel Mokka is 2 cm shorter than the Honda HR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Mokka is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 431 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1456 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage space. Opel Mokka has 75 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 84 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Opel Mokka can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`959 | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests, but Honda HR-V is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |