Opel Mokka 2012 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga is a more dynamic driving. Opel Mokka engine produces 35 HP less power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Ford Kuga. Due to the lower power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Opel Mokka consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Opel Mokka over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Astra | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Mokka might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Opel Mokka is smaller. Opel Mokka is 25 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Mokka is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1568 litres | |
|
Ford Kuga has more luggage space. Opel Mokka has 100 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 196 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`959 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |