Opel Mokka 2012 vs Dacia Duster 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Opel Mokka engine produces 10 HP more power than Dacia Duster, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Dacia Duster. Despite the higher power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster, which means that by driving the Opel Mokka over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Duster can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Duster version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Dacia Duster 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Astra | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Nissan Almera, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Opel Mokka is smaller, but slightly higher. Opel Mokka is 4 cm shorter than the Dacia Duster, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Mokka is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 473 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1636 litres | |
|
Dacia Duster has more luggage space. Opel Mokka has 117 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Duster. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Duster (by 264 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.4 metres more than that of the Dacia Duster, which means Opel Mokka can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`959 | 1`710 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Duster has serious deffects in 190 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Dacia Duster has
| |