Opel Mokka 2012 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is a more dynamic driving. Opel Mokka engine produces 25 HP less power than Chevrolet Trax, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Chevrolet Trax. Due to the lower power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Opel Mokka consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Astra | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Mokka might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Trax engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Mokka is 3 cm longer than the Chevrolet Trax, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Mokka is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`959 | 1`884 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Chevrolet Trax has
| |