Opel Mokka 2012 vs Suzuki SX4 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Opel Mokka is more dynamic to drive. Opel Mokka engine produces 23 HP more power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 44 NM more than Suzuki SX4. Thanks to more power Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Meriva, Opel Insignia | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Mokka engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2013 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.59 m | |
| Opel Mokka is 2 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Mokka is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1269 litres | |
| Opel Mokka has 74 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 103 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki SX4, which means Opel Mokka can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`959 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki SX4 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |