Opel Mokka 2012 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Opel Mokka engine produces 18 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Mokka consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 191 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota RAV4 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Insignia | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Opel Mokka is smaller. Opel Mokka is 9 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Mokka is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1752 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`926 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Opel Mokka has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Toyota RAV4, so Opel Mokka quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |