Opel Mokka 2012 vs Renault Captur 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Opel Mokka is more dynamic to drive. Opel Mokka engine produces 50 HP more power than Renault Captur, but torque is 45 NM less than Renault Captur. Thanks to more power Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 600 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Captur can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Captur version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Insignia | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Captur might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Captur 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Captur 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.57 m | |
| Opel Mokka is 16 cm longer than the Renault Captur, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Mokka is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1235 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Captur, which means Opel Mokka can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`926 | 1`763 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests, but Renault Captur is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Captur has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Renault Captur has
| |