Opel Mokka 2012 vs Ford Kuga 2013

 
Opel Mokka
2012 - 2016
Ford Kuga
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 140 HP150 HP
Torque: 175 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.1 seconds10.7 seconds
Ford Kuga is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Mokka engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Ford Kuga. Due to the lower power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.97.7
Opel Mokka consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
850 km on highway950 km on highway
Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years4 years
Engine spread: Used also on Opel InsigniaUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Mokka might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.52 m
Width: 1.78 m1.84 m
Height: 1.66 m1.68 m
Opel Mokka is smaller.
Opel Mokka is 25 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Mokka is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data456 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1372 litres1568 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9262`250
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

above average
Opel Mokka has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably better
Average price (€): 960012 200
Pros and Cons: Opel Mokka has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Ford Kuga has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv