Opel Mokka 2020 vs Citroen C3 2016
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Opel Mokka is more dynamic to drive. Opel Mokka engine produces 20 HP more power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Citroen C3. Thanks to more power Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.9 | |
| Opel Mokka consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that by driving the Opel Mokka over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Mokka might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Opel Mokka 2020 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ... More about Opel Mokka 2020 1.2 engine Citroen C3 2016 1.2 engine: Because the timing belt is placed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to axial play in the crankshaft. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.15 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Opel Mokka is larger. Opel Mokka is 16 cm longer than the Citroen C3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Mokka is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1105 litres | 922 litres | |
|
Opel Mokka has more luggage capacity. Opel Mokka has 50 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 183 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.3 metres more than that of the Citroen C3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |