Opel Mokka 2015 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga is a more dynamic driving. Opel Mokka engine produces 53 HP less power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Ford Kuga. Due to the lower power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Opel Mokka over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Opel Mokka is smaller. Opel Mokka is 25 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Mokka is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1372 litres | 1568 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`883 kg | 2`250 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`374 kg | 1`692 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 509 kg | 558 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |