Opel Mokka 2016 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 155 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Opel Mokka engine produces 25 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 165 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
940 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
660 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.22 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Mokka is 5 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Mokka is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 322 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | no data | |
Opel Mokka has more luggage capacity. Opel Mokka has 34 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 1.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Opel Mokka can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`764 | 2`130 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | below average | |
Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 11 000 | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |