Opel Mokka 2016 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Opel Mokka engine produces 7 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that by driving the Opel Mokka over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Mokka consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Astra | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Skoda Yeti engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Mokka is 5 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Mokka is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Mokka has 49 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. This could mean that the Opel Mokka uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 1.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Opel Mokka can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`764 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |