Opel Mokka 2016 vs Skoda Kamiq 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Opel Mokka engine produces 35 HP less power than Skoda Kamiq, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Skoda Kamiq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Kamiq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kamiq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kamiq. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Kamiq can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Kamiq version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Astra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Skoda Kamiq engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Skoda Kamiq 2019 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Kamiq 2019 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.53 m | |
| Opel Mokka is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Kamiq, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Mokka is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1372 litres | 1395 litres | |
|
Skoda Kamiq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Opel Mokka uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kamiq (by 23 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.7 metres more than that of the Skoda Kamiq, which means Opel Mokka can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`764 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Kamiq scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Kamiq scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Skoda Kamiq has
| |