Opel Mokka 2016 vs Renault Captur 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Captur is a more dynamic driving. Opel Mokka engine produces 35 HP less power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Renault Captur. Due to the lower power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.4 | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Mokka consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Captur can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Captur version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Astra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Renault Captur engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Captur 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Opel Mokka is larger. Opel Mokka is 15 cm longer than the Renault Captur, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Mokka is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 309 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1235 litres | |
|
Opel Mokka has more luggage capacity. Opel Mokka has 47 litres more trunk space than the Renault Captur. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 137 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 1.1 metres more than that of the Renault Captur, which means Opel Mokka can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`764 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Opel Mokka has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Captur, so Opel Mokka quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Renault Captur has
| |