Opel Mokka 2016 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Opel Mokka engine produces 2 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 1 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi ASX 2012 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Astra | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Mokka might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.62 m | |
| Opel Mokka is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Mokka is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Opel Mokka has 86 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 153 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Opel Mokka can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`764 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Mokka has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |