Opel Mokka 2016 vs Mazda CX-3 2018

 
Opel Mokka
2016 - 2018
Mazda CX-3
2018 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP121 HP
Torque: 155 NM207 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds9 seconds
Mazda CX-3 is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Mokka engine produces 6 HP less power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Mazda CX-3. Due to the lower power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.56.2
Opel Mokka consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 53 litres48 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway880 km on highway
Ground clearance: 158 mm (6.2 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.28 m
Width: 1.78 m1.77 m
Height: 1.66 m1.54 m
Opel Mokka and Mazda CX-3 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 356 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1372 litres1260 litres
Opel Mokka has 6 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 112 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-3, which means Opel Mokka can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7641`692
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Mokka has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 11 60018 600
Pros and Cons: Opel Mokka has
  • lower price
Mazda CX-3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv