Opel Mokka 2016 vs Jeep Renegade 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Renegade is a more dynamic driving. Opel Mokka engine produces 55 HP less power than Jeep Renegade, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Jeep Renegade. Due to the lower power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade, which means that by driving the Opel Mokka over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Renegade 2014: The car is equipped with Active Drive I/LOW, a full-time 4x4 system that requires no driver input. Under normal conditions, this system sends all available torque to the front wheels. If the system detects that the front wheels are moving faster than the rear wheels, it will send power through the power transfer unit to the rear axle to maintain the same wheelspeed. Active Drive Low adds a low-range gear in 4WD Low mode for situations requiring low speeds, such as crawling across big rocks or towing a marine trailer out of the water. The Active Drive Low system provides a 20:1 crawl ratio with significantly controlled throttle response. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Renegade can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Mokka is 2 cm longer than the Jeep Renegade, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Mokka is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 351 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1297 litres | |
| Opel Mokka has 5 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Renegade. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 75 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Renegade, which means Opel Mokka can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`764 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jeep Renegade scores higher in safety tests. The Jeep Renegade scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Jeep Renegade has
| |