Opel Mokka 2016 vs Opel Crossland 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 152 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 205 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Opel Mokka is more dynamic to drive. Opel Mokka engine produces 42 HP more power than Opel Crossland, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Opel Crossland. Thanks to more power Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
The Opel Crossland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
940 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
560 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Opel Crossland 2017 1.2 engine: Because the timing belt is placed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to axial play in the crankshaft. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.11 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.61 m | |
Opel Mokka is 16 cm longer than the Opel Crossland, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Mokka is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 410 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1255 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Opel Mokka has 54 litres less trunk space than the Opel Crossland. This could mean that the Opel Mokka uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 117 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.3 metres more than that of the Opel Crossland. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`854 | 1`805 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | low | |
Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 11 000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Opel Crossland has
| |