Opel Mokka 2016 vs Opel Mokka 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Opel Mokka 2016 and Opel Mokka 2012 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
The Opel Mokka 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Mokka 2016 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka 2012, which means that by driving the Opel Mokka 2016 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka 2016 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka 2012. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 53 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 16 years | 16 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Mokka 2016 and Opel Mokka 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 356 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1372 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Mokka 2016 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka 2012, which means Opel Mokka 2016 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`843 | 1`959 | |
Safety: | |||
Opel Mokka 2012 scores higher in safety tests. The Opel Mokka 2012 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | 10 600 | 8000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |