Opel Mokka 2016 vs Opel Crossland 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 81 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Opel Mokka is more dynamic to drive. Opel Mokka engine produces 59 HP more power than Opel Crossland, whereas torque is 82 NM more than Opel Crossland. Thanks to more power Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Crossland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Mokka could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Meriva, Opel Insignia | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Mokka engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.61 m | |
| Opel Mokka is 6 cm longer than the Opel Crossland, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Mokka is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1255 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Opel Mokka has 54 litres less trunk space than the Opel Crossland. This could mean that the Opel Mokka uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 117 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.3 metres more than that of the Opel Crossland. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`828 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Opel Crossland has
| |