Opel Mokka 2016 vs Opel Mokka 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Mokka
2016 - 2019
Opel Mokka
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 1.61.4 - 1.8

Performance

Power: 110 - 152 HP110 - 140 HP
Torque: 155 - 320 NM155 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 - 12.5 seconds9.4 - 12.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.3 - 6.74.7 - 7.9
Opel Mokka 2016 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Mokka 2012. On average, Opel Mokka 2016 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka 2012.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 158 mm (6.2 inches)158 mm (6.2 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.28 m
Width: 1.78 m1.77 m
Height: 1.66 m1.67 m
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Mokka 2016 and Opel Mokka 2012 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 356 litres356 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1372 litres1372 litres
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Mokka 2016 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka 2012, which means Opel Mokka 2016 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`860~ 1`929
Safety:
Opel Mokka 2012 scores higher in safety tests. The Opel Mokka 2012 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 11 6009600
Pros and Cons: Opel Mokka has
  • lower fuel consumption
Opel Mokka has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv