Opel Mokka 2016 vs Opel Mokka 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.4 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 - 152 HP | 110 - 140 HP | |
Torque: | 155 - 320 NM | 155 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 12.5 seconds | 9.4 - 12.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 6.7 | 4.7 - 7.9 | |
Opel Mokka 2016 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Mokka 2012. On average, Opel Mokka 2016 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka 2012. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Mokka 2016 and Opel Mokka 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 356 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1372 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Mokka 2016 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka 2012, which means Opel Mokka 2016 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`860 | ~ 1`929 | |
Safety: | |||
Opel Mokka 2012 scores higher in safety tests. The Opel Mokka 2012 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | 11 000 | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |