Opel Mokka 2012 vs Ford Kuga 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 140 HP | 140 - 182 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 - 320 NM | 230 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 12.5 seconds | 9.7 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.9 | 5.9 - 7.7 | |
|
Opel Mokka petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Opel Mokka equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Opel Mokka is smaller. Opel Mokka is 25 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Mokka is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1568 litres | |
|
Ford Kuga has more luggage space. Opel Mokka has 100 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 196 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`929 | ~ 2`213 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |