Opel Meriva 2003 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
Opel Meriva is more dynamic to drive. Opel Meriva engine produces 10 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Thanks to more power Opel Meriva reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Meriva consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Meriva could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Meriva consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 54 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
580 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Meriva engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra, Opel Signum | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 407, Citroen C5 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Meriva might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.04 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.64 m | |
Opel Meriva is smaller. Opel Meriva is 24 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Meriva is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1410 litres | no data | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage space. Opel Meriva has 200 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Meriva is 1 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Opel Meriva can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`300 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 6.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Meriva has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |