Opel Meriva 2003 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2004

 
Opel Meriva
2003 - 2004
Mitsubishi Space Star
2004 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 84 HP98 HP
Torque: 138 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.5 seconds12 seconds
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Meriva engine produces 14 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Star. Due to the lower power, Opel Meriva reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.87.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.5 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Meriva consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Meriva could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Meriva consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway930 km on highway
610 km with real consumption740 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Engine production duration: 4 years14 years
Engine spread: Used also on Opel AstraUsed also on Mitsubishi Lancer
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.05 m
Width: 1.69 m1.72 m
Height: 1.62 m1.52 m
Opel Meriva is smaller, but higher.
Opel Meriva is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Meriva is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 350 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1410 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Meriva is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8051`200
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons:
    Mitsubishi Space Star has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv