Opel Meriva 2003 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.8 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 125 HP | 90 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 - 240 NM | 135 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 17.8 seconds | 12.2 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 7.9 | 5.5 - 8.7 | |
|
Opel Meriva petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara Picasso. On average, Opel Meriva equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Opel Meriva is smaller. Opel Meriva is 24 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Meriva is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1410 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage space. Opel Meriva has 190 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Meriva is 1 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Opel Meriva can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`844 | ~ 1`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 6.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Meriva has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |